Case Studies

Verified Results, Not Marketing Claims

Every performance number on this page is backed by timestamped, PDF-verified records created before match kick-off. Explore our track record, verification methodology, and anonymized audit examples.

Track Record

Performance at a Glance

Aggregate performance metrics across all signal types and sports, continuously updated as new match results are verified.

56.8%
Overall Win Rate

Across all signal types

10,000+
Matches Analyzed

Multi-sport, global coverage

228+
PDF-Verified Records

Pre-match timestamped

50+
Bookmakers Covered

Data from global markets

HDP Sniper
58.3%
1,847 signals tracked

Sport: Football (Soccer)

Period: 2023 - Present

Active Trader
55.1%
3,241 signals tracked

Sport: Multi-sport

Period: 2023 - Present

Shield
61.2%
982 signals tracked

Sport: Football, Basketball

Period: 2024 - Present

These results power the consumer signals available on OddsFlow.ai

Verification

How We Verify Every Claim

Transparency is not a feature we bolt on; it is the architecture of our credibility. Every signal prediction follows the same verification protocol.

1

Pre-Match PDF Generation

Before every match, a PDF is generated containing the signal prediction, fair-value odds, bookmaker odds, confidence score, and timestamp. This PDF is cryptographically hashed.

2

Immutable Timestamping

The PDF hash is recorded with a verified timestamp, ensuring the prediction cannot be altered after match start. The timestamp is independently verifiable by any third party.

3

Post-Match Settlement

After the match concludes, the actual result is recorded and compared against the prediction. Win/loss status is appended to the record, and aggregate metrics are recalculated.

4

Public Audit Trail

All settled records are available for review. Any partner or prospective client can request access to the full archive of verified predictions for independent analysis.

Sample Verified Prediction
PDF #00228
Signal Type:HDP Sniper
Match:Team A vs Team B
League:Premier League
Market:AH -0.75
Fair Value:1.87
Book Odds:1.95
Edge:+4.28%
Confidence:High (92%)
Timestamp:2025-01-15 14:23:07 UTC
Hash:a3f8c2...d91e4b
Result:WIN

Illustrative example. Team names anonymized. Actual PDFs contain full match details.

Audit Examples

Anonymized Audit Case Studies

Real results from real audits, anonymized to protect partner confidentiality. Each case study demonstrates the depth and actionability of OddsFlow Partners' odds quality analysis.

Sportsbook
Tier 1
European Sportsbook Operator
Multi-brand operator with 200K+ active users across 12 regulated markets

Challenge

Increasing losses on Asian handicap markets in lower-tier football leagues. Internal trading team suspected stale lines but lacked tools to quantify the problem or identify specific markets.

Findings

  • 14.3% of AH lines in Ligue 2 and Serie B were consistently stale by 3+ minutes
  • Estimated annual exposure from stale lines: EUR 180K
  • 3 specific feed sources identified as root cause

Outcome

Operator renegotiated feed SLAs with specific latency requirements and deployed OddsFlow Partners monitoring on the affected markets. Stale line incidents reduced by 87% within 60 days.

Composite Score: 72/100 β†’ 91/100
Feed Provider
B2B
Asian Odds Feed Provider
Mid-size odds feed supplier serving 15+ sportsbook clients across Southeast Asia

Challenge

Two major clients threatened non-renewal citing β€œquality concerns” without specific data. The provider had no independent benchmarks to refute or validate the claims.

Findings

  • Overall feed accuracy was 93.7%, well above industry average
  • Weakness isolated to tennis and esports totals (86.1% accuracy)
  • Latency was fastest-in-class for football markets

Outcome

Provider used OddsFlow Partners certification report to retain both clients and address the specific tennis/esports gap. Subsequently used certification in 3 successful new client pitches.

Composite Score: 88/100 β†’ Certified
Sportsbook
Startup
North American Digital Sportsbook
Newly launched operator in 3 US states seeking to optimize odds quality from day one

Challenge

As a new entrant, the operator needed to validate that their odds feed provider and internal pricing adjustments produced competitive, fair lines. No historical data to benchmark against.

Findings

  • NFL and NBA lines were competitive (top-quartile efficiency)
  • MLB and NHL lines showed systematic bias of +1.5% overround vs. market
  • Player prop markets had 3x the anomaly rate of game lines

Outcome

Operator implemented OddsFlow Partners monitoring for continuous quality tracking. Used audit insights to adjust internal pricing models for MLB/NHL, improving competitive positioning within 30 days.

Composite Score: 68/100 β†’ 84/100
Trust

Why Our Results Are Credible

Pre-Match Timestamps

Every prediction is recorded and hashed before the match begins. Post-hoc alteration is cryptographically impossible.

Open Methodology

Our algorithms, models, and evaluation code are published on GitHub for independent verification and peer review.

Downloadable Records

Partners can download the complete archive of verified predictions to run their own independent performance analysis.

No Survivorship Bias

We report all signals, including losses. Our win rate is calculated across the complete history, not cherry-picked winners.

Experience our intelligence first-hand β€” try free tools at OddsFlow.ai

Ready to See What Your Audit Looks Like?

Get the same depth of analysis that these case studies demonstrate, tailored to your specific odds data. Free, confidential, and delivered in 24 hours.